PDF Ebook Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker
Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker Exactly how can you transform your mind to be more open? There lots of sources that could assist you to improve your ideas. It can be from the various other experiences as well as story from some individuals. Schedule Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker is one of the trusted resources to obtain. You could discover a lot of publications that we discuss here in this web site. As well as now, we show you among the best, the Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker
PDF Ebook Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker
Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker. Thanks for visiting the most effective site that supply hundreds kinds of book collections. Right here, we will certainly offer all publications Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker that you require. Guides from renowned authors as well as publishers are offered. So, you can appreciate currently to get one by one sort of publication Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker that you will search. Well, related to guide that you desire, is this Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker your selection?
Do you ever before recognize the book Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker Yeah, this is an extremely fascinating e-book to review. As we informed recently, reading is not sort of responsibility task to do when we need to obligate. Checking out should be a practice, a good behavior. By reviewing Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker, you could open the new globe and also obtain the power from the world. Everything could be gained with the e-book Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker Well briefly, book is very powerful. As exactly what we provide you here, this Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker is as one of checking out publication for you.
By reading this publication Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker, you will obtain the ideal thing to obtain. The new thing that you do not should invest over cash to reach is by doing it alone. So, exactly what should you do now? Check out the link page and also download the publication Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker You can get this Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker by online. It's so very easy, right? Nowadays, technology actually supports you tasks, this on the internet book Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker, is as well.
Be the first to download this book Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker as well as let read by finish. It is extremely simple to review this book Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker because you do not need to bring this printed Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker everywhere. Your soft file publication can be in our device or computer system so you could delight in reading everywhere and every time if required. This is why lots numbers of people additionally review guides Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker in soft fie by downloading guide. So, be just one of them who take all benefits of checking out guide Human Smoke: The Beginnings Of World War II, The End Of Civilization, By Nicholson Baker by online or on your soft documents system.
Bestselling author Nicholson Baker, recognized as one of the most dexterous and talented writers in America today, has created a compelling work of nonfiction bound to provoke discussion and controversy -- a wide-ranging, astonishingly fresh perspective on the political and social landscape that gave rise to World War II.
Human Smoke delivers a closely textured, deeply moving indictment of the treasured myths that have romanticized much of the 1930s and '40s. Incorporating meticulous research and well-documented sources -- including newspaper and magazine articles, radio speeches, memoirs, and diaries -- the book juxtaposes hundreds of interrelated moments of decision, brutality, suffering, and mercy. Vivid glimpses of political leaders and their dissenters illuminate and examine the gradual, horrifying advance toward overt global war and Holocaust.
Praised by critics and readers alike for his exquisitely observant eye and deft, inimitable prose, Baker has assembled a narrative within Human Smoke that unfolds gracefully, tragically, and persuasively. This is an unforgettable book that makes a profound impact on our perceptions of historical events and mourns the unthinkable loss humanity has borne at its own hand.
- Sales Rank: #667410 in Books
- Brand: Brand: Simon n Schuster
- Published on: 2008-03-11
- Released on: 2008-03-11
- Ingredients: Example Ingredients
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.25" h x 1.56" w x 6.12" l, 1.87 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 576 pages
- Used Book in Good Condition
Amazon.com Review
Bestselling author Nicholson Baker, recognized as one of the most dexterous and talented writers in America today, has created a compelling work of nonfiction bound to provoke discussion and controversy -- a wide-ranging, astonishingly fresh perspective on the political and social landscape that gave rise to World War II.
Human Smoke delivers a closely textured, deeply moving indictment of the treasured myths that have romanticized much of the 1930s and '40s. Incorporating meticulous research and well-documented sources -- including newspaper and magazine articles, radio speeches, memoirs, and diaries -- the book juxtaposes hundreds of interrelated moments of decision, brutality, suffering, and mercy. Vivid glimpses of political leaders and their dissenters illuminate and examine the gradual, horrifying advance toward overt global war and Holocaust.
Praised by critics and readers alike for his exquisitely observant eye and deft, inimitable prose, Baker has assembled a narrative within Human Smoke that unfolds gracefully, tragically, and persuasively. This is an unforgettable book that makes a profound impact on our perceptions of historical events and mourns the unthinkable loss humanity has borne at its own hand.
Questions for Nicholson Baker
Amazon.com: This is obviously a big departure for you, in both style and subject. How did the project come about, and how did it find this form?
Baker: I was writing a different book, on a smaller historical subject, when I stopped and asked: Do I understand World War Two? And of course I didn't. Also I'd been reading newspapers from the thirties and forties, and I knew that there were startling things in them.
In earlier books, I've looked closely at moments to see why they matter, and I've tried to rescue things, people, ideas from overfamiliarity. So in a way a book like this--which moves a loupe over some incidents along the way to a much-chronicled war--was a natural topic.
But yes, the style is a departure: it's very simple here out of respect for the hellishness of the story that I'm trying to assemble, piece by piece.
Amazon.com: Why World War Two in particular?
Baker: Politicians constantly fondle a small, clean, paperweight version of this war, as if it provides them with moral clarity. We know that it was the most destructive five year period in history. It was destructive of human lives, and also of shelter, sleep, warmth, gentleness, mercy, political refuge, rational discussion, legal process, civil tradition, and public truth. Millions of people were gassed, shot, starved, and worked to death by a paranoid fanatic. The war's victims felt as if they'd come to the end of civilization.
But then we also say that because it turned out so badly, it was the one just, necessary war. We acknowledge that it was the worst catastrophe in the history of humanity--and yet it was "the good war." The Greatest Generation fought it, and a generation of people was wiped out.
If we don't try to understand this one war better--understand it not in the sense of coming up with elaborate mechanistic theories of causation, but understand it in the humbler sense of feeling our way through its enormity--then cartoon versions of what happened will continue to distort debates about the merits of all future wars.
Amazon.com: You largely kept your own opinions out of the text, except for the choices you made in what to include and a few editorial comments here and there, as well as your short Afterword at the end. It makes for a real tension between the neutral tone and the sense, at least on the part of this reader, that there are some passionate opinions behind it. What authorial role did you want to establish?
Baker: I found that my own cries of grief, amazement, or outrage--or of admiration at some quiet heroism--took away from the chaos of individual decisions that move events forward.
It helps sometimes to look at an action--compassionate, murderous, confessional, obfuscatory--out of context: as something that somebody did one day. The one-day-ness of history is often lost in traditional histories, because paragraphs and sections are organized by theme: attack, counterattack, argument, counterargument. That's a reasonable way to proceed, but I rejected it here for several reasons. First, because it fails to convey the hugeness and confusion of the time as it was experienced by people who lived through it. And, second, because I wanted the reader to have to form, and then jettison, and then re-form, explanations and mini-narratives along the way--as I did, and as did a newspaper reader in, say, New York City in September, 1941.
I think the pared-down, episodic style allowed me to offer some moments of truth that I wouldn't have been able to offer had I had uppermost in my mind the necessity of making transitions and smoothing out inconsistencies and sounding like me. I offer no organized argument: I want above all to fill the readers mind with an anguished sense of what happened.
Amazon.com: I was telling someone about your book and how it failed to convince me of what I took to be its thesis, and his response was, "Wow, you really made me want to read it." And that's my response too: if your point was to convince me that we shouldn't have fought World War II, then the book didn't work, but I'm still very glad I read it. But maybe that wasn't your point at all.
Baker: I'm really pleased that you responded that way. I didn't want to convince, but only to add enriching complication. Long ago I wrote an essay called "Changes of Mind" in which I tried to talk about how gradual and complicated a shift of conviction can be. I left overt opinionizing out of this book so that a reader can draw his or her own conclusions, folding in other knowledge.
There are many books about the war that I value highly even though I don't agree with the world-outlook of the people who wrote them. To take a major example: Churchill's own memoir-history is completely fascinating and revealing--and a great pleasure to read--although I happen to think that Churchill was himself a bad war leader.
There's no point in trying to use a book to replace one simple set of beliefs about World War Two with another simple set of beliefs. The war years are alive with contradictions and puzzles and shake-your-head-in-wonder moments. You're going to look at it in different ways on different days because you're going to have different moments uppermost in your mind.
On the other hand, I don't want to hide what I think. Here's what I am, more or less: I'm a non-religious pacifist who is sympathetic to Quaker notions of nonviolent resistance and of refuge and aid for those who need help. I find appealing what Christopher Isherwood called "the plain moral stand against killing." I don't expect people to look at things this way, necessarily--after all, it took me a while to get there myself. But I do hope that my book will offer some thought-provocations that anyone, of any ideological persuasion, will want to mull over.
Amazon.com: It's hard to believe there's something new to say about what may be the most written-about event in human history. What did you feel about approaching such a well-chronicled subject? What were you most surprised to find? What responses have you gotten from historians and other readers?
Baker: There were many surprises. For instance, I didn't expect Herbert Hoover, who argued for the lifting of the British blockade in order to get food to Jews in Polish ghettoes and French concentration camps, to be a voice of reason and compassion. I didn't know that German propagandists used the phrase "iron curtain" before Churchill did. I didn't know that in 1940 the Royal Air Force tried to set fire to the forests of Germany. I didn't know how interested the United States government was in arming China. I didn't know how public was Japan's unhappiness with the American oil embargo. I didn't know that many of the people who worked hardest to help Jews escape Hitler were pacifists, not interventionists.
I've had interesting reactions from historians, who seem to understand (for the most part) that I'm not trying to write a comprehensive history of the beginnings of the war. I've had some very good reviews and some very bad ones. The bad ones seem to follow the teeter-totter school: that if a dictator and the nation he controls is evil, then the leader of the nation who opposes the evil dictator must be good. Life isn't that way, of course. There is in fact no "moral equivalence" created by examining coterminous violent and repulsive acts. The notion of moral equivalence is a mistake, because it undermines our notions of personal responsibility and law. Each act of killing is its own act, not something to be heaped like produce on a balancing scale. One person, as Roosevelt said, must not be punished for the deed of another--though he didn't follow his own precept.
Gandhi comes up sometimes. It was said in a review that I "adore" Gandhi. That's not quite right. Gandhi is in many ways an admirable and perceptive man. He spoke gently even while thousands of his supporters were in jail and his country was being bombed by an occupying power. But the years told on him, and he sometimes came to sound, as Nehru once observed in a memoir, cold--indifferent to suffering. He is one voice, and a voice worth listening to.
My real heroes, though, are people like Victor Klemperer, who responded to Hitlerian terror not with counterviolence, but with beautiful nonresistance: by writing a masterpiece of a diary. He and Romanian diarist Mihael Sebastian have the last word for that reason. And I've dedicated the book to British and American pacifists--I want this book to rescue the memory of their loving, troubled efforts to help.
The most interesting and helpful set of responses to the book so far has been at www.edrants.com, where a group of participants discussed Human Smoke for a week, adding all kinds of thoughts, analogies, comparisons, and criticisms. I've never been through anything like it before, and I'm the better for it.
Amazon.com: Your recent celebration of Wikipedia in the New York Review of Books has gotten a lot of attention (deservedly so). Did the style and philosophy of Wikipedia influence the way you wrote Human Smoke? Have you made any Wikipedia updates based on what you found in your research.Baker: I used Wikipedia during the writing of the book, especially to check facts about subtypes of airplanes and ships--e.g., the Bristol Beaufighter I cited in the first paragraph of the review. Wikipedia is amazingly strong and precise on military hardware. (And on when a British Lord became a Viscount, and on a million other things.) But I've been writing movies, and the model I often had in my mind while working on Human Smoke was the movie documentary--in which short scenes and clips follow each other with a minimum of narration.
From Publishers Weekly
"Burning a village properly takes a long time," wrote a British commander in Iraq in 1920. In this sometimes astonishing yet perplexing account of the destructive futility of war, NBCC award–winning writer Baker (Double Fold) traces a direct line from there to WWII, when Flying Fortresses and incendiary bombs made it possible to burn a city in almost no time at all. Central to Baker's episodic narrative- a chronological juxtaposition of discrete moments from 1892 to December 31, 1941-are accounts from contemporary reports of Britain's terror campaign of repeatedly bombing German cities even before the London blitz. The large chorus of voices echoing here range from pacifists like Quaker Clarence Pickett to the seemingly cynical warmongering of Churchill and FDR; the rueful resignation of German-Jewish diarist Viktor Klemperer to Clementine Churchill's hate-filled reference to "yellow Japanese lice." Baker offers no judgment, but he also fails to offer context: was Hitler's purported plan to send the Jews to Madagascar serious, or, as one leading historian has called it, a fiction? Baker gives no clue. Yet many incidents carry an emotional wallop-of anger and shock at actions on all sides-that could force one to reconsider means and ends even in a "good" war and to view the word "terror" in a very discomfiting context. (Mar.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Bookmarks Magazine
It’s no surprise that a pacifist portrayal of World War II will invite controversy. Yet what really seemed to divide reviewers of Human Smoke was not Baker’s dovishness but his devices: the many short anecdotes and quotations that comprise this book. This style, which allows readers to reach their own conclusions, won over some critics, even if they remained unconvinced by Baker’s pacifism. Yet many others found the book’s form an offense in itself, charging that Baker takes quotations out of context and disingenuously portrays Allied leaders as the equivalents of Hitler or Stalin. Other reviewers were confused rather than incensed by Baker’s many snippets, suggesting that Human Smoke might not be the best book for someone just learning about the war, or even for someone looking for a pacifist take. Alternatively, one reviewer suggested Hiroshima by John Hersey or Stalingrad by Antony Beevorâ€"books that describe how any war results in horrific acts of violence by both sides.
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
Most helpful customer reviews
11 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
A Hidden History Revealed
By Al Swanson
As a life-long conservative, I've found myself challenging my beliefs over the past five or so years. I've read a lot of books I would have called "pinko-commie" not too long ago. "The Corporation" was the first, followed by Howard Zinn's history of the 20th Century. Those gave rise to questioning our country.
I'd long heard that WWII was precipitated by issues seldom discussed in conventional history books. This book solidifies many of those things I'd heard. What's amazing is that the book, by and large, is not modern day opinion and observation of 60 year old facts, but rather a selection of opinions and facts FROM 60 years ago. Our history books make it seem as if the Allies were peace-loving peoples forced into a state of war by the crazed Axis countries.
While Hitler may have started the war, the book shows how the incidents that happened after the beginning of the war (and indeed, before it ever started) are not the way our history books seem to remember them. The sanitized history we are all fed here is shattered when you read this book.
Even if you choose not to accept or believe all you read here, the information is good to have regardless of your political leanings. Like I said, I'm a conservative (so much so that folks used to say I couldn't even make a left turn) but events of the past 10 years, bolstered by books like this, make me question where I really stand. When a book makes you question your beliefs - you know it's a powerful book.
15 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
A Brave, If Irritating, Work
By Timothy Haugh
I am a tremendous fan of Nicholson Baker. I find him to be one of the best prose stylists in America today. I find his work to be eminently readable--absorbing, subtly subversive, sometimes irritating, certainly entertaining. Even when I disagree with him, whether that be the conclusions he draws in his non-fiction or some outrageousness in his fiction, I love to read him.
Human Smoke joins Baker's oeuvre as one of his best pieces of non-fiction. In it, he gives us a different perspective on the lead-up and first years of World War II. Essentially, it is his desire to show us how the Allies, Churchill and Roosevelt, in particular, brought on the war, committed atrocities and enabled the Nazis and Japanese to commit their atrocities. For example, the British engaged in haphazard bombing in Europe forcing the Luftwaffe to start the Battle of Britain while Roosevelt gave the Chinese planes and crews and positioned the Pacific fleet to egg on the Japanese, knowing in advance Pearl Harbor would be attacked, drawing us into the war just as he wished.
In point of fact, almost no one in this book comes off well. The pacifists look rather pathetic as they are dragged off to jail while Gandhi encourages people to stand and be slaughtered rather than defend themselves. Jews and non-Jews alike seem in denial about what is going on in Nazi-controlled territories. The only people who come off half-way decent are ones you wouldn't expect: people like Herbert Hoover who works to relieve the suffering of children in Europe, and Hitler who constantly seems to be pushing for peace treaties, responding to provocation and pushing Jews to emigrate.
Now, though much of what Baker is reporting is true, he is, of course, rather selective in his reporting. And I didn't walk away from this book changing my feelings about Churchill, Roosevelt, or Hitler, for that matter. Much of what Baker talks about in this book are things with which I was already familiar. Still, it is good to be reminded of the fact that in big historical events like this, there is always more going on than meets the eye. Politicians, no matter how decent, are playing deep, complex games that even they can probably not fully articulate.
And when it comes right down to it, Baker writes so well. I love the structure of this book. It reads and in some ways appears on the page as a series of telegrams. Each "message" is dated and comes across as pure reportage based, as it is, on sources from the time. As we all know, primary sources such as newspapers and letters can be as deceiving and self-serving as any other form of media but it still makes for wonderful reading.
Baker takes a series risk with this book. The Allies in World War II were the "Greatest Generation" and taking them to task does not seem like a wise road to popularity. On the other hand, those people not automatically turned off by Baker's premise will find a lot of interest here. My respect for people is rarely swayed by knowing that they are flawed, human, and products of their time. If you are the same, I recommend this book to you.
121 of 148 people found the following review helpful.
There is no revisionism on the planet that can turn Churchill into Hitler, no matter how eloquently the attempt is made.
By Shawn M. Ritchie
"Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization", best-selling author Baker's first work of non-fiction, is a history of the buildup to World War II as told via snippets from newspapers, personal diaries, memoirs, etc. Baker provides a minimum of personal interjections or opinions along the way, preferring instead to let the chosen selections speak for themselves. The end result is a grim and depressing narrative that shows the breaking out of World War II as the inevitable conclusion of the machinations of American industrialists looking for new markets in Asia and Europe, Roosevelt's desires to impose his visions of an Anglo-American order upon the world, and, particularly, Winston Churchill's ruthless and bloodthirsty pursuit of a wider and more devastating war.
It needs to be said by the reviewer and, hopefully, known by the reader that Baker is emphatically not a historian. The text itself and post-release interviews with Baker himself indicate that the author had a thesis in his head before the book was written, and the material presented is that which most strongly supports it. The result is a tale of a haunting descent into both total war and industrial holocaust that, possibly, could have been, if not avoided, at least mitigated, had the men in power simply had the moral fiber to choose differently.
This book is going to appeal strongly to a certain subset of readers that wish to believe that capitalism, anti-semitism, etc., were stronger factors in the outbreak of World War II than, say, fascism and national socialism. The supposed anti-semitism of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt gets almost as much ink as that of the Nazis, particularly as it involves the USA's (along with most every other nation on the planet) unwillingness to take in more Jewish refugees than our immigration laws at the time allowed. Likewise, the push by American aircraft manufacturers to design and sell new warplanes to all and sundry in the 30's, even though the total figures involved come out to about 100 planes total throughout the pre-1939 period, gets more consideration as a cause of the increasing belligerence and actual combat around the globe than does the considerably more gigantic buildup of the fascist and Soviet militaries during the same time.
Likewise, a lot of pages and ink are given over to the pronunciamentos and goals of various pacifist movements through the first decades of the 20th Century, with the clear subtext of "had we listened to them, the war would never have started, or at least not been as vicious". While there is much to be said for studying the pacifist movement prior to and during the start of World War II, there is little to be said for believing for an instant that, had Churchill or Roosevelt just listened more closely to the them, Hitler and Tojo would've somehow been less warlike as a result.
That leads to the biggest problem of the book; it's _incredibly_ biased. All histories are, to some extent, a reflection of the author's biases, sure. However, the lack of any context being provided here would lead the uneducated reader to assume that the viciousness of the war itself and the Holocaust need not have happened as they did. The lack of much editorial context by the author actually serves to reinforce this aspect; the reader has no guide as to why Baker chose a given text in the first place. The reader, if not Baker's argument, would actually be better served if Nicholson had chosen to provide more editorial context for his selections. At least that way, the pro-pacifist, anti-Churchillian bias of the author would be a known quantity instead of something just hinted at.
The obvious counter-argument can be made that, well: these ARE Churchill and Roosevelt's and Chennault's own words, are they not? Sure, they are. However, the context that would clearly show that these men were emphatically NOT the primary actors driving the events of the era is simply not there. We hear much of the bloodthirsty-ness of Churchill, Bomber Harris, etc. The comparable and considerably more voluminous and damning words of the Hitlers and Mussolinis of the era are much less present.
When they are present at all, they've been chosen to show the rare moments when these men were hoping for an end to the war they had started (so long as it ended on their terms and with their bloody conquests already made allowed to be kept).
While a very engrossing and emotionally effective (and affecting) read, I could not recommend "Human Smoke" to anyone whom I was not already aware of possessing a clear understanding of how World War II came to be. While the study of pacifism in the 30's and early 40's has its merits, the conclusion that it would have been effective had just certain men in the West been willing to listen to it, is unsupportable.
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker PDF
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker EPub
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker Doc
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker iBooks
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker rtf
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker Mobipocket
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization, by Nicholson Baker Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar